A Letter-o to Our Hetero Friends
Here at COWA, from time to time we like to mix things up a tad. We bombard you with IEDs of hilarity on an almost-daily basis, but sometimes we choose to "bring the room down" (that's showbiz talk). In hetero terms, it's like when Barry Manilow, without skipping a beat, goes right into "Mandy" after singing "Copacabana." We endeavor, Manilow-like, to take you on a rollercoaster of emotions. Again, in hetero terms, COWA is like "Friends" that way (and in that way ONLY, we might add).
So here's the deal: against our will, whilst enjoying an idyllic weekend in the Poconos (swimming, waterskiing, drinking ourselves into a stupor; sometimes simultaneously), we found ourselves embedded in a political conversation with a certain honkey hetero (honkero?) who, in spite of his rabid opposition to Obama, mentioned that if he was elected at least he'd "teach the blacks to speak better." Wow.
While trying to teach a pig to sing is futile and it annoys the pig, we nevertheless presented the following argument: both candidates are basically centrist. Besides which, the ideological split on Capitol Hill will stand sentry against any radical idea (i.e., healthcare reform, saving the planet) that threatens to rock the boat or endanger anyone's re-election. The differences between the candidates (and the parties they represent) contrast most acutely in the area of civil rights. We went on to say that given the glasses through which yours truly gazes at life, civil (read: gay) rights has to be the trump card. My racist (though affable in his way...aren't they all?) sparring partner nodded...not in agreement, but understanding. "If I were you I'd feel the same way," he said. Sigh.
So this is for you, caucasian heteros. We have to ask; why are civil rights always off your radar screens? Are you not patriots? Isn't the reason to be patriotic embodied in a constitution which guarantees our equality? Isn't that the essence of freedom, and what made America such a grand experiment? Or has patriotism been dumbed down and distilled into Toby Keith and Bill O'Reilly and Flag Lapel Pins and NASCAR? The thought, no lie, depresses us to tears.
Our freedom, I promise, will not come under fire in Fallujah or Kabul. Our boys might, but not our freedom. It's strengthened and weakened by the laws we pass (or don't), the rights we safeguard (or not), and the extent to which we realize our founding fathers' vision by putting a seat at the American table for every law abiding citizen. Or whether, Bible in-hand, we shoo those we dislike from the feast while wearing those insincere "love the sinner, hate the sin" smiles that haunt our nightmares.
What a tiresome argument it's become. Okay, so the Bible green-lights homophobia. The Bible also instructs us to put purveyors of shellfish to death. But our last jaunt to Red Lobster (don't ask) revealed it to be banal and bourgeois, hardly the bloodbath demanded by scripture. We no longer require a rape victim to marry her attacker if she neglects scream loud enough, as mandated in Deuteronomy. We've let a few things slide. Why not this?
Is it just about safety in numbers and following the herd? As when, lemming-like, you all hailed Seinfeld as sheer genius, made Michael Bolton a millionaire and outfitted your families in Crocs? Why do you rush out to vacuum your Volvos every time yet another rapture-right douche is caught with his pants down at a rest stop (a daily occurrence of late)? Is it easier to close your eyes and hope we go away because we make you visualize sexual situations that make you pee your pants a little bit? It confuses us.
Let's be real. The economy blows; that has to be priority number one. Our international cred, national security and ongoing military conflicts all place, collectively, a photo-finish second. For us, basic human rights pick up the rear, but only by a nose (vague anal inference totally intentional).
Okay, McCain's not beelzebub. We don't smell burning sulfur when we see him on television (as with Romney or Cheney). Sure, he might yet pull some economic/domestic/national security policies out of his ass that actually do us no harm. But in the long run, so what? We can think of a few powerful men in history who did good things for their countries along those lines, yet rather neglected the whole human rights thing. They are not remembered fondly outside of an Aryan Nation rally.
On the other hand, Obama is officially against gay marriage. He has to be in order to get elected. While that's akin to an abolitionist defending Jim Crow laws, we suppose we'll take what we can get. Truth is, Obama isn't really our champion. He's just less hateful. Sadly, we have to settle for that.
Like you, we want this tedious conversation to cease. There's only one way to do that, however; let us marry whom we love. Let us raise families. Invite us to the table. Live your lives as you see fit, while always defending your countryman's right to do the same...especially those with whom you disagree. These issues will go the way of the buggy whip and betamax. Doesn't that sound infinitely more pleasant?
Oh, and by the way: Crocs are over.

















